Wednesday, 13 July 2011

Why is lightning not ever used as a source of energy?


A. People have considered harnessing lightning for electrical power,
but no serious attempts are currently under way, nor are any planned.
It is impractical for numerous reasons, as listed below.

1. Most of the power in lightning is dissipated as thunder and light,
which cannot be easily harnessed to generate electric power.
2. However, even just the electrical current of lightning is
considerable -- 20,000 amps on average, the same as 100 steel welders.
But the power is on for only a brief fraction of a second, so the
total power is actually small, only enough to power a 100-watt light
bulb for six months.
3. The huge surge of electrical current over very brief times makes
storing the energy impractical.
4. Lightning strikes to specific locations are infrequent and
inconsistent. This makes scheduling power availability impractical.
5. Lightning can be very damaging. The collection systems have to be
incredibly robust, which would drive up costs. Lightning is also very
dangerous, making it tough on the collection system workers.
6. Lightning would have to be collected over a huge area, making the
system impractically expensive.

So as you can see for several scientific, engineering, economic and
legal problems, harnessing lightning for electric power is not
practical."